 One question that comes up most often is, which investment provides a better return? People want to know if investing in real estate properties is more lucrative or if real estate syndications are truly the best choice. Real estate syndications’ major benefit of being a true hands-off investment, saves investors from the stress of maintenance issues, tenant complaints, and dipping cashflow. That right there can make you feel like syndications are a better deal (who wouldn’t want to avoid that stress!?). On the other hand, with rental properties, you have to do all the legwork. That includes finding a broker and a property manager and coordinating with lenders. So, in exchange for all that hard work, you’d expect better returns, right? Thankfully, I’ve owned and participated in both types of investments, so I’m able to honestly answer this question. So let's do a little bit of math and dive in to find our answer... Real Estate Syndication First let’s review what a $50,000 real estate syndication deal would look like cashflow-wise, just so we have a comparable reference. If I were to invest $50,000 into a real estate syndication with an 8% return, that equates about $333 per month in cash flow. $50,000 x 8%= $4,000 / 12 months = $333 If I could make $333 per month with a 50K investment in a real estate syndication, then a real estate rental that requires sweat equity would need to provide me more than $333 each month in order to be worth it overall. Rental Real Estate Now, let’s have a look at one of my rental properties. Lets use an example from a four-plex in Alabama that cost $240,000 at the time of purchase. Each of the four units rent for between $600 - $700 a month. I put $50,000 down and wound up with mortgage payments around $1,350 a month. If you add up taxes and insurance, our monthly obligation comes out to $1,731 a month. Let's assume the goal of owning rental property is that the rent you earn is greater than the mortgage and bills you owe on the property. In other words, the rental needs to have some cash flow in order to work. December 2018 On a month where all four units were occupied, except one didn’t pay, we had 3 rent payments come in for a total of $2,035 before expenses. Expenses for this example month included management fees, HVAC service fees, and utility fees which total $660. $2,035 - $660 = $1,375 $1,375 sounds great, right? If I owned the property free and clear, it would be great to pocket $1,375, but I have to pay the mortgage. Remember back when I said the mortgage plus taxes and insurance was $1,731? This means for the month of December of 2018, I actually lost money on this rental property. Almost nothing’s the same month-to-month, and there have GOT to be some good months. So. we need to examine a few more windows of time to really gain a clear picture. November 2018 This was yet another month where there were four occupying tenants but only 3 rents being paid. November’s expenses included the regular management fees, utility fees, plus an electrical repair. The total income minus expenses came out to $1,270, which, as you know, didn’t cover the mortgage payment. I was in the hole $461 that month. October 2018 Fortunately in October, all four tenants paid rent, which brought in $2,590. The expenses were about the same as November’s (above) which brings our net operating income for October to $1,966. After paying our mortgage, taxes, and insurance of $1,731 on that property, the cash flow was $235 beautiful, positive dollars (thank goodness!). September 2018 If we go back one more month to September, we see another month where, thankfully, all tenants paid. In this month we had minimal maintenance issues so the income of $2,688 resulted in $586 positive cashflow after all expenses and the mortgage payment. $586 is fantastic. But remember, this is only one of four months that shows this much in profit. Rental Property Review My investment of $50,000 on a rental property yielded cashflow (rents paid minus property expenses, mortgage, taxes, and insurance) of $586 in September, $235 in October, -$461 in November, and -$356 in December. The overall result of those four months, 2 positive and 2 negatives, was a cash flow of just $4. You read that right. Four hard earned DOLLARS. Rental properties require ebbs and flows. I can repeat this example story on multiple other investments made over the years. Tenants come and go and maintenance expenses are unpredictable. If you’re really interested in consistent cash flow in exchange for minimal work, rental properties aren’t going to be your cup of tea. Rental properties might be for you if you really want a hands-on investment and if you’re okay with having some tough months in exchange for those with positive cashflow. You’ll just have to do everything in your power to ensure most of the months are positive to make it “worth it” long term. So, Which is Better? As in life, there’s no right answer for everyone.
Rental real estate does have a potential for greater income - if the stars align and you have a fully occupied property with low maintenance costs and tenants that pay rent. There’s no such thing as a maintenance-free property though, and to boost rental rates, you’ll want to do some improvements here and there. For a no-fuss investment with consistent cashflow, then a real estate syndication might be your best bet. Comments are closed.
|
Justin GrimesAlly in generational wealth creation & protection. Archives
October 2020
Categories |
RSS Feed
|
© COPYRIGHT 2020-2021. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
|
Timbermoss Capital does not make investment recommendations, and no communication through this website or in any other medium should be construed as such. Investment opportunities posted on this website are "private placements" of securities that are not publicly traded, are subject to holding period requirements, and are intended for investors who do not need a liquid investment. Private placement investments are NOT bank deposits (and thus NOT insured by the FDIC or by any other federal governmental agency), are NOT guaranteed by Timbermoss Capital and may lose value. Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any federal or state securities commission or regulatory authority has recommended or approved any investment or the accuracy or completeness of any of the information or materials provided by or through the website. Investors must be able to afford the loss of their entire investment. Any financial projections or returns shown on the website are estimated predictions of performance only, are hypothetical, are not based on actual investment results and are not guarantees of future results. Estimated projections do not represent or guarantee the actual results of any transaction, and no representation is made that any transaction will, or is likely to, achieve results or profits similar to those shown. Any investment information contained herein has been secured from sources that Timbermoss Capital believes are reliable, but we make no representations or warranties as to the accuracy of such information and accept no liability therefor. Offers to sell, or the solicitations of offers to buy, any security can only be made through official offering documents that contain important information about risks, fees and expenses. Investors should conduct their own due diligence, not rely on the financial assumptions or estimates displayed on this website, and are encouraged to consult with a financial advisor, attorney, accountant, and any other professional that can help you to understand and assess the risks associated with any investment opportunity.